![]() She graduated with honours from the Master's of Business Administration at the University of Western Ontario.įunny, brainy and unapologetically tipsy, her goal in life is to invite both the novices and the knowledgeable to the table to share a glass of wine (or three). Natalie studied the Romantic Poets at Oxford University with Jonathan Wordsworth. An accredited sommelier, she is a member of the National Capital Sommelier Guild, the Wine Writers Circle and several French wine societies with complicated and impressive names. To fund her late-night vinous habits, Natalie MacLean holds down day jobs as an author, online wine course instructor and wine reviewer. Fisher Award for Excellence in Culinary Writing from Les Dames d'Escoffier International. Fisher Distinguished Writing Award from the James Beard Foundation and the M.F.K. She is the only person to have won both the M.F.K. ![]() She was named the World's Best Drinks Writer at the World Food Media Awards, and has won four James Beard Foundation Journalism Awards. She is the wine expert on CTV's The Social, Canada's largest daytime television show CTV News and Global Television's Morning Show. I have to admit I'm not an OS aficionado.Natalie's first book Red, White and Drunk All Over: A Wine-Soaked Journey from Grape to Glass and her second book Unquenchable: A Tipsy Quest for the World's Best Bargain Wines were both selected as one of Amazon's Best Books of the Year. Thank you for your answer though, I didn't know Apple were completely getting rid of the GNU stuff they have/had. What I'm truly wondering is if a Mac-through-Darling app would work better than its Windows-through-Wine alter ego, provided Darling and Wine had received the same amount of attention. I recommend the 2007 Yorba Shake Ridge Ranch Barbera from Amador County with its blueberry/blackberry, plum fruit, spicy cinnamon and clove notes and bright acidity. There are Mac-exclusive apps that would be interesting to see on Linux and from a theoretical standpoint, I was wondering if it wouldn't be easier, or at least more "sensible", to port Mac apps to Linux, knowing MacOS actually shares some building blocks with Linux, as opposed to porting Windows apps through Wine. Barbera satifies these requirements: it is an amazing wine with food and such a chameleon, working beautifully with polenta, pasta, risotto, pizza, mushrooms, stews, etc. I just got curious really Wine is all the rage, but I haven't heard anyone talk about Darling whatsoever. But I figured, since it is possible to provide compatibility for Windows system calls on an operating system that couldn't be more different, it has to be possible to do the same for MacOS, granted it, and Linux, are both Unix-like in a sense. Yes, I am aware that this would be no small undertaking. They didn't have to "black box" reverse engineer any secret system calls for which no published spec existed like the WINE devs have to do. The guys who created GnuStep were able to create an implementation that allowed them to port their NextStep app without rewriting a single line of code of their app's code. No, my characterization is spot on because the OpenStep spec was published for the purpose of getting people to create other implementations on other OSes. So your characterization is wrong, because you are inferring that GNUstep "had all or most" of what became the OS X APIs The OpenStep spec was published specifically in an attempt to make it easier to create API implementations on other platforms. So, yes, some Win32 APIs are very well documented but, others are kept secret and none of the documented ones were done so in an attempt to get Windows API implementations done on other OSes. In fact, one of the biggest challenges the WINE developers have had is in reverse engineering those system calls and functions for which MS has never released a spec. Microsoft has rejected any attempts in the same spirit. Quite different from what happened in the Windows world. OpenStep was being actively promoted by Next as a way to get Next apps running on other platforms. Just like the Win32 specification was released. What part of my comment makes you think that I didn't already understand that?ĭid you not see where I wrote: "the guys who wrote GnuStep were able to create their own implementation"? But the specification is not the implementation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |